Tag: a priori of argumentation

July 30, 2020

Who does a rule apply to?

Who does a rule apply to? That’s the question I was asking myself when I…

Read the post

July 30, 2016

Three Short Thoughts on Argumentation

Some short thoughts that I was having yesterday (none of them are original but I…

Read the post

July 26, 2016

Animals, Argumentation, and Rights

Here is a Hoppe quote from The Economics and Ethics of Private Property that is…

Read the post

July 24, 2016

Argumentation Ethics, Libertarianism, & Culture

The Socratic Catholic has recently written posts about libertarianism, culture, and the incoherence of libertarianism. You…

Read the post

July 21, 2016

Replying to “Another Attack on Body-Ownership”

The author of the piece I responded to in “A Defense of Body-ownership and Parents”…

Read the post

July 20, 2016

Axiom vs. a priori

Many libertarians use the word axiom when they mean “a (synthetic) a priori statement.” Rothbard…

Read the post

July 19, 2016

The Double Meaning of “Cannot”

Something important I realized yesterday is the fact that “cannot” is used in two different…

Read the post

July 19, 2016

Clarifying Further What The A Priori of Argumentation Is

I was rereading a section of The Economics and Ethics of Private Property by Hans-Hermann Hoppe…

Read the post

July 3, 2016

Logic, Existence, and Argumentation

In this article http://steve-patterson.com/everything-is-grounded-in-logic/, Steve Patterson points out that “logic and existence are inseparable,” and that…

Read the post

May 24, 2016

Lying Is Like Coercion

It is often said by libertarians that libertarianism opposes coercion and that “ideas aren’t…

Read the post